Texas
Supreme Court Ruling
November 22, 2005 -- In a 7–1 opinion, the Texas Supreme Court today
struck down the school finance system, finding that it had evolved into an
unconstitutional
state
property tax. The Court also found that there was substantial evidence that “the
public education system has reached the point where continued improvement will
not be possible absent significant change” and that “it remains
to be seen whether the system’s predicted drift toward constitutional
inadequacy will be avoided by legislative reaction to widespread calls for
changes.”
The Court gave the Legislature until June 1, 2006 to address the constitutional
deficiencies in the system. For the full ruling and summary, select the links
below:
- The full court ruling can be found on the Texas
Supreme Court
website.
- An excellent summary
(65k) of
the ruling is provided by plaintiffs' attorneys.
The West Orange-Cove Plaintiffs, the lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, hailed
the Court’s ruling. Haynes and Boone LLP attorney George W. Bramblett,
Jr., co-counsel for the West Orange-Cove Plaintiffs, remarked: “Today
is a great day for the State of Texas. The Court’s historic decision
will be applauded by educators, teachers, parents, and students across the
state.
"The Court’s ruling on our state property tax claim means that
the Legislature must build financial capacity into the school funding system
so that districts can hire quality teachers and provide the type of programming
that communities across our state need and expect. And, the Court reaffirmed
that the Legislature has a constitutional duty to provide an adequate level
of funding for our public educational system and that this duty is enforceable
in court,” said Mr. Bramblett.
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP attorney David Thompson, co-counsel for the West
Orange-Cove Plaintiffs, continued: “For the past decade, the Legislature
has been shifting the responsibility of funding Texas schools onto local districts
and onto the local property tax, but the local property tax can no longer bear
this heavy burden. The Supreme Court’s decision makes clear that it is
time for the Legislature to step up to the plate and pay for the high academic
standards it has imposed on districts and students.”
Currently, more than two-thirds of school districts in Texas – which
educate more than 80% of the students in the state – are taxing at or
very near the maximum tax rate. The Supreme Court concluded that these districts
lacked “meaningful discretion” to reduce their tax rates without
jeopardizing their ability to provide a constitutionally adequate education.
While the Court concluded that the system is “adequate” now, it
reserved the right to revisit the issue in the future. In doing so, the Court
rejected the State’s claim that the adequacy of the educational system
is a “political question” not subject to judicial review.
The Legislature has failed to address the looming school finance crisis on
multiple occasions, including its 2003 regular session, a 2004 special session,
the 2005 regular session, and two special sessions called by Governor Perry
this summer.
“The Legislature’s focus has been on simply trading property taxes
for consumer taxes, without adding any real new money into the school system.
And they could not even accomplish that meager goal. We hope that the Legislature
will heed the Supreme Court’s call and adopt ‘big picture’ reforms
that will place the Texas public school finance system on firm financial footing
for years to come,” remarked Haynes and Boone LLP attorney Mark Trachtenberg,
co-counsel for the West Orange-Cove Plaintiffs.
Representing West Orange Cove
Plaintiffs
West Orange-Cove C.I.S.D.
Coppell I.S.D.
La Porte I.S.D
Port Neches-Groves I.S.D.
Dallas I.S.D.
Austin I.S.D.
Houston I.S.D.
Alamo Heights I.S.D.
Allen I.S.D.
Argyle I.S.D.
Beckville I.S.D.
Carrollton-Farmers Branch I.S.D.
Carthage I.S.D.
College Station I.S.D.
Crowley I.S.D.
Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.
Darrouzet I.S.D.
|
|
Deer Park I.S.D.
Fairfield I.S.D.
Goose Creek I.S.D.
Graford I.S.D.
Grapevine-Colleyville I.S.D.
Hallsville I.S.D.
Highland Park I.S.D.
Humble I.S.D.
Katy I.S.D.
Kaufman I.S.D.
Lake Travis I.S.D.
Lewisville I.S.D.
Lubbock I.S.D.
Marble Falls I.S.D.
McCamey I.S.D.
Miami I.S.D.
|
|
Northeast I.S.D.
Northside I.S.D.
Northwest I.S.D.
Palo Pinto I.S.D.
Pearland I.S.D.
Plano I.S.D.
Pringle-Morse C.I.S.D.
Richardson I.S.D.
Round Rock I.S.D.
Round Top-Carmine I.S.D.
Spring Branch I.S.D.
Spring I.S.D.
Stafford Municipal I.S.D.
Sweeny I.S.D.,
Terrell I.S.D.
Texas City I.S.D.
|
Judge Dietz's Ruling on State Funding Lawsuit
State District Judge John Dietz ruled in favor of
plaintiffs in a landmark school finance lawsuit, which
culminated in September, 2004. Judge Dietz entered an injunction shortly
thereafter, giving the state one year to address an inadequate school
finance system. Plano ISD is among the 300 school districts who served
as plaintiffs.
Dr. Doug Otto, superintendent of schools, explained that, “The Texas
school finance lawsuit came to an end when Judge Dietz ruled in favor of
all children
in the state of Texas. He very aggressively stated that the school finance
system is under-funded and that districts need more money in order to help
students meet the new state and federal standards.” Dr. Otto serves
as president of the Texas School Coalition, which provides research, information
and consultation regarding school finance legislation.
“The judge indicated that, not only should districts have more money
to meet the standards, but that they need additional dollars for meaningful
discretion which would allow them to offer programs that meet the expectations
of their communities,” said Dr. Otto. “The judge’s decision
was not only that there is not enough money and that the $1.50 tax cap is tantamount
to a statewide property tax, but that districts ought to have latitude to offer
enrichment programs that are ‘over and above’ state minimum requirements.”
Judge Dietz's official ruling was signed and posted on November 30, 2004,
the Texas
Education Agency legal
services Web site.
Plano ISD 2004-05 Budget Update
Plano
ISD implemented budget reductions
for this school year totaling $17
million and resulting in cuts
in personnel and services. The cuts for the 2004-05
budget were
over and above the nearly $40 million that has already been cut
from the budget over
the past five years.
Plano
ISD Reduction in Force (19k)
-This school board agenda item dated December
9, 2003, details the board-approved reduction
in force for the 2004-05 school year.
These
cuts result from a badly-flawed state school
finance system, reduced property values and virtually
no increase in state funding. It is essential
that the state legislature rewrite the Texas
school finance system and find a way to adequately
fund Texas schools ensuring equity and excellence.
Plano
ISD is party to a lawsuit against the state,
but decisions in that case may take years. In
order to guarantee that the legislature meets
it obligations, write your local legislator and
Governor Perry asking that a special legislative
session on school finance be held this spring
or sooner.
We
cannot wait. We cannot do nothing. The future
of our
students is at stake.
|